It scored 9.0 points out of possible 10 and got a well-deserved verdict ?Highly Recommended?.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, the last year’s winner, only had to content itself with the second line in the tournament bracket (8.4 points) and the Sport Auto experts’ conclusion ?Recommended?.
?Conditionally Recommended?
All the other competing tire models got the overall verdict ?Conditionally Recommended? for various reasons.
The third stair of the winner pedestal, first of all because of its average braking performance on wet and dry pavement alike, got occupied by Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 (7.9 points).
The new model Hankook K127 Ventus S1 Evo³ (7.6 points) turned out to be generally rather safe but its relatively weak handling and oversteer in the wet did not let it get any higher than the fourth place.
The fifth place was scored by Bridgestone Potenza S001 (7.5 points). Its braking performance was the weakest on test.
The sixth to cross the finish line was Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R (7.4 points), which, together with relatively weak braking performance in the wet, also demonstrated high rolling resistance.
The summer tires Falken Azenis FK510 and Toyo Proxes Sport shared the last line of the tournament bracket (7.1 points each). What clinched the matter in their case was weaker grip in the wet and in the dry, coupled with Falken’s oversteer on wet pavement and relatively low handling precision of Toyo.
고오오성능인 건 분명함 +_+
급이 저정도까진 아닌데 ㅎㅎ
근데 4등이라니 ㄷㄷㄷ
0/2000자